Grant Road Coalition -Central Segments
The Grant Road Coalition published a white paper in March 2022 outlining the expectations for the completed project
To see the Grant Road Coalition White paper for Phases 5 and 6 go to: http://www.jeffersonpark.info/grant-rd-widening.html
To see the Grant Road Coalition White paper for Phases 5 and 6 go to: http://www.jeffersonpark.info/grant-rd-widening.html
Jan 23 E-news TUCSON AGENDA discussion of RTA Next and March election
Simple and to the point regarding Grant Road by Jefferson Park
Simple and to the point regarding Grant Road by Jefferson Park
January 23, 2026 | Listen Online | Read Online
The crown jewel of the Regional Transportation Authority’s accomplishments is probably the modern streetcar, which connects Tucson’s west side to the University of Arizona by cutting a path through downtown.
It’s pretty popular with locals, pushing more riders into regular mass-transit use, and has been credited with more than $3 billion in private-sector capital investment along the 3.9-mile route.
On the other side of the coin, there’s a substantial list of unfinished projects promised to voters a little more than 20 years ago, when they first approved the creation of the taxing district designed to build transportation improvements across Pima County.
While the streetcar is the best-known RTA project, the regional collaboration between Tucson, Pima County, South Tucson, three towns and two tribal governments has also helped fund road projects, bike and pedestrian infrastructure, safety upgrades and extended bus service to outlying areas across the county.
In a few weeks, voters will receive ballots for Propositions 418 and 419 — collectively known as RTA Next — asking voters to extend the half-cent sales tax for another two decades.
Election Day is March 10.
Technically, Proposition 418 asks voters to approve the proposed regional transportation plan, while Proposition 419 keeps the half-cent sales tax in place. And as we keep the failure of last year’s Proposition 414 in mind, it’s worth emphasizing this: RTA Next does not raise the sales-tax rate — it keeps it exactly where it is today.
........
As of the end of 2025, the RTA had completed 1,053 total projects, spending more than $1.73 billion on regional transportation. But not all of the RTA’s promises were fulfilled — thanks to a combination of funding shortfalls, project cost overruns, internal bureaucratic turf wars and, in some cases, a lack of political consensus on projects approved two decades ago.
What it means for Tucson
The expansion of Grant Road is a good microcosm of what went right — and what went wrong — with the original voter-approved plan.By the end of this year, the RTA will have completed widening Grant Road to six lanes, with improved bike lanes, sidewalks, transit stops and drainage along sections between Oracle and Swan.
But a central section of the project — from Fremont Avenue to Sparkman Boulevard— included in the voter-approved package in 2004, is still about 18 months out, said Sam Credo, director of the Tucson Department of Transportation.
“That one's probably the one that is on everybody's mind right now. Especially given the fact Tucson doesn't have any east-west freeway,” Credo said.
With a $50 million price tag, the unfinished section of the Grant Road widening project has been included in the RTA Next proposal.
If voters don’t approve the two propositions, the project could be stalled indefinitely, even though the RTA and the city have already spent millions on design work and property acquisition along Grant Road.
“If (RTA Next) is unsuccessful, then as a region, we have to decide what do we do with our finite dollars available to complete the projects that are on the slate,” he said.
A reminder: The city is facing a $40 million budget shortfall in the next fiscal year, and the city charter prioritizes funding for core services — which do not necessarily include road-widening projects. Even popular ones.
Other large projects shifted from the current RTA plan to RTA Next include a now-rescoped plan for 22nd Street improvements east of Interstate 10, including a planned bridge over the Union Pacific rail lines. A full list of RTA Next projects can be found here.
A lesser-known aspect of the RTA is its role in funding bus service and other forms of mass transit across the greater Tucson area.
RTA Next promises an estimated $720 million dedicated to public transit, with a majority of that funding directed to projects inside Tucson’s city limits. That’s nearly $200 million more than what was included in the first RTA plan.
If voters decide against renewing the half-cent countywide transportation tax, the impact on bus service would be severe — especially for routes outside the city limits.
The countywide structure of the RTA means that Sun Tran — a city-run system — helps fund transit routes well beyond Tucson’s borders.
Two maps emerged from the Tucson City Council meeting Wednesday night, laying out a worst-case scenario for how service would be affected if voters reject RTA Next......
Tucson Mayor Regina Romero has sat on the RTA board for the last five years and said the somber discussion was hard, but necessary.
“We don't know what's going to happen in March of this year with Proposition 418 and 419. But as mayor and council, we have a responsibility to talk about the potential consequences of not seeing an initiative that, frankly, all of us at this table worked really hard at to get to where it's at,” Romero said.
She added that for the RTA Next proposal to move forward — given the competing needs of different communities — compromises were inevitable.
“Is it perfect? Absolutely not,” Romero said. “We could have it all. But I think that it is important that my colleagues here on the council really know what the scenario is.”
Newly elected Councilmember Miranda Schubert raised concerns about whether there is a Plan B if voters reject Propositions 418 and 419.
“I'm interested in making sure we're not just jumping to the worst-case scenario and cutting a service that is so essential to constituents, and that we're exploring all of our options,” she said.
A big proponent of mass transit, Schubert wasn’t on the council when it signed off on the RTA Next proposal now on the ballot.
She told her colleagues she plans to meet with RTA director — and former Tucson City Manager — Mike Ortega to discuss possible backup plans if voters reject it.
RTA Next doesn’t promise a crown jewel like the streetcar. Instead, it asks voters whether the region is willing to continue to pay to keep the lights on, the buses running and the half-built roads from staying half-built forever.
Ballots for Proposition 418 snd 419 are expected to be mailed on February 11.
The crown jewel of the Regional Transportation Authority’s accomplishments is probably the modern streetcar, which connects Tucson’s west side to the University of Arizona by cutting a path through downtown.
It’s pretty popular with locals, pushing more riders into regular mass-transit use, and has been credited with more than $3 billion in private-sector capital investment along the 3.9-mile route.
On the other side of the coin, there’s a substantial list of unfinished projects promised to voters a little more than 20 years ago, when they first approved the creation of the taxing district designed to build transportation improvements across Pima County.
While the streetcar is the best-known RTA project, the regional collaboration between Tucson, Pima County, South Tucson, three towns and two tribal governments has also helped fund road projects, bike and pedestrian infrastructure, safety upgrades and extended bus service to outlying areas across the county.
In a few weeks, voters will receive ballots for Propositions 418 and 419 — collectively known as RTA Next — asking voters to extend the half-cent sales tax for another two decades.
Election Day is March 10.
Technically, Proposition 418 asks voters to approve the proposed regional transportation plan, while Proposition 419 keeps the half-cent sales tax in place. And as we keep the failure of last year’s Proposition 414 in mind, it’s worth emphasizing this: RTA Next does not raise the sales-tax rate — it keeps it exactly where it is today.
........
As of the end of 2025, the RTA had completed 1,053 total projects, spending more than $1.73 billion on regional transportation. But not all of the RTA’s promises were fulfilled — thanks to a combination of funding shortfalls, project cost overruns, internal bureaucratic turf wars and, in some cases, a lack of political consensus on projects approved two decades ago.
What it means for Tucson
The expansion of Grant Road is a good microcosm of what went right — and what went wrong — with the original voter-approved plan.By the end of this year, the RTA will have completed widening Grant Road to six lanes, with improved bike lanes, sidewalks, transit stops and drainage along sections between Oracle and Swan.
But a central section of the project — from Fremont Avenue to Sparkman Boulevard— included in the voter-approved package in 2004, is still about 18 months out, said Sam Credo, director of the Tucson Department of Transportation.
“That one's probably the one that is on everybody's mind right now. Especially given the fact Tucson doesn't have any east-west freeway,” Credo said.
With a $50 million price tag, the unfinished section of the Grant Road widening project has been included in the RTA Next proposal.
If voters don’t approve the two propositions, the project could be stalled indefinitely, even though the RTA and the city have already spent millions on design work and property acquisition along Grant Road.
“If (RTA Next) is unsuccessful, then as a region, we have to decide what do we do with our finite dollars available to complete the projects that are on the slate,” he said.
A reminder: The city is facing a $40 million budget shortfall in the next fiscal year, and the city charter prioritizes funding for core services — which do not necessarily include road-widening projects. Even popular ones.
Other large projects shifted from the current RTA plan to RTA Next include a now-rescoped plan for 22nd Street improvements east of Interstate 10, including a planned bridge over the Union Pacific rail lines. A full list of RTA Next projects can be found here.
A lesser-known aspect of the RTA is its role in funding bus service and other forms of mass transit across the greater Tucson area.
RTA Next promises an estimated $720 million dedicated to public transit, with a majority of that funding directed to projects inside Tucson’s city limits. That’s nearly $200 million more than what was included in the first RTA plan.
If voters decide against renewing the half-cent countywide transportation tax, the impact on bus service would be severe — especially for routes outside the city limits.
The countywide structure of the RTA means that Sun Tran — a city-run system — helps fund transit routes well beyond Tucson’s borders.
Two maps emerged from the Tucson City Council meeting Wednesday night, laying out a worst-case scenario for how service would be affected if voters reject RTA Next......
Tucson Mayor Regina Romero has sat on the RTA board for the last five years and said the somber discussion was hard, but necessary.
“We don't know what's going to happen in March of this year with Proposition 418 and 419. But as mayor and council, we have a responsibility to talk about the potential consequences of not seeing an initiative that, frankly, all of us at this table worked really hard at to get to where it's at,” Romero said.
She added that for the RTA Next proposal to move forward — given the competing needs of different communities — compromises were inevitable.
“Is it perfect? Absolutely not,” Romero said. “We could have it all. But I think that it is important that my colleagues here on the council really know what the scenario is.”
Newly elected Councilmember Miranda Schubert raised concerns about whether there is a Plan B if voters reject Propositions 418 and 419.
“I'm interested in making sure we're not just jumping to the worst-case scenario and cutting a service that is so essential to constituents, and that we're exploring all of our options,” she said.
A big proponent of mass transit, Schubert wasn’t on the council when it signed off on the RTA Next proposal now on the ballot.
She told her colleagues she plans to meet with RTA director — and former Tucson City Manager — Mike Ortega to discuss possible backup plans if voters reject it.
RTA Next doesn’t promise a crown jewel like the streetcar. Instead, it asks voters whether the region is willing to continue to pay to keep the lights on, the buses running and the half-built roads from staying half-built forever.
Ballots for Proposition 418 snd 419 are expected to be mailed on February 11.
Thursday, January 22,2026:
Ward 3 will be hosting an RTA Next presentation Followed by Q&A in the Community Room at 1510 Grant Road. Doors open at 5:30pm with the presentation beginning at 5:45pm.
The Regional Transportation Authority Board has approved a 20-year transportation plan and Pima County voters will decide on the $2.67 billion plan on March 10, 2026. This plan will shape how we move around the region for decades to come, funding roadway enhancements, transit services, bikeways, and more.
What’s Coming to Ward 3 Ward 3 roadway projects in the RTA Next plan include: Silverbell Road: Camino del Cerro to Ina Road (Modified scope, final phase) First Avenue: Orange Grove Road to Ina Road (Modified scope, whole project) Grant Road: Fremont Ave to Sparkman Blvd (final phase) Prince Road: Romero Road to Country Club Road The above projects are all scheduled for the first and second periods of the program, meaning within the first ten years of the program. Grant Road will get completed, but it’s important to note the final phase is part of RTA Next. Complete details of the plan including the project descriptions can be viewed here.
Why It Matters Beyond Ward 3, the RTA brings regional benefits. Over the last 20 years, the RTA has helped establish the SunLink streetcar downtown, provided funding for transit including the dial-a-ride and paratransit services, the Loop bike path, and road improvements to help us all get where we need to go throughout the region. In the meantime, visit rtanext.com to learn more, sign up for their newsletter, or listen to their RTA Delivers Podcast - Regional Transportation Authority of Pima County and stay informed ahead of the important March 2026 decision – it’s up to you.
Grant Road Plan Information
ORIGINAL PLAN FOR OUR SECTION OF PHASE 5/6: go to: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/city-services/planning-development-services/documents/grant_road_ccv.pdf
NEW REVISED PROPOSAL: per RTA technical management-go to: https://rtamobility.com/wp-content/docs/2025/05/RTA-TMC-2025-05-14-Full-Meeting-Packet.pdf p.54 (Option 1 put forward)
Above information presented at the May 22 meeting of the Grant Road Coalition. Attendees were dismayed by the proposed changes that will eliminate green space and, as a result of a funding shortfall, back off all initial promises of mitigation for homes along Grant Road.
NEW REVISED PROPOSAL: per RTA technical management-go to: https://rtamobility.com/wp-content/docs/2025/05/RTA-TMC-2025-05-14-Full-Meeting-Packet.pdf p.54 (Option 1 put forward)
Above information presented at the May 22 meeting of the Grant Road Coalition. Attendees were dismayed by the proposed changes that will eliminate green space and, as a result of a funding shortfall, back off all initial promises of mitigation for homes along Grant Road.
BROKEN PROMISES Landscape possibilities and safety features canceled? No mitigation for homes??
Originally promised green space and traffic mitigations above. See whole plan: https://www.tucsonaz.gov/files/sharedassets/public/v/1/city-services/planning-development-services/documents/grant_road_ccv.pdf
Minutes of May 22 Meeting and subsequent correspondence at
http://www.grantroadcoalition.com/minutes-correspondence.html
http://www.grantroadcoalition.com/minutes-correspondence.html
GRANT ROAD COALITION MEETING TO DISCUSS FUTURE OF PHASE 5/6
May 22, 2025 6:00 PM
Ward 3 Meeting Room in person or zoom
Join Zoom Meeting
https://us02web.zoom.us/j/83044907447?pwd=7O9bMWkWEUyV2buWe4tHe2S7BCSrcl.1
What are the options for Grant Road from Santa Rita to Campbell Avenue? What is the funding situation? What is the timing? We are inviting those who know to come talk to the neighbors.
May 22, 2025 6:00 PM
Ward 3 Meeting Room in person or zoom
Join Zoom Meeting
https://us02web.zoom.us/j/83044907447?pwd=7O9bMWkWEUyV2buWe4tHe2S7BCSrcl.1
What are the options for Grant Road from Santa Rita to Campbell Avenue? What is the funding situation? What is the timing? We are inviting those who know to come talk to the neighbors.
2024 - RTAnext published Draft Project List map of proposed projets
No allocations to complete Grant Road Project
No allocations to complete Grant Road Project
Grant Road Coalition asks "Where's the funding to complete the project?"
January 2025 letter sent to RTA & COT from Jefferson Park asking the question.
November 2024 letter sent to RTA & COT from Jefferson Park asking the question.
November 22, 2024
Regional Transportation Authority
1 E Broadway Blvd, Suite 401
Tucson AZ, 85701
[email protected]
RTA and City of Tucson:
Jefferson Park Neighborhood Association strongly urges that Grant Road Phases 5 & 6 be finished now. The RTA Next Draft does not appear to include the completion of the Grant Road Project. Very real issues presently exist and will only worsen if the project is left unfinished.
First, consider the disaster that has occurred as a result of complicated scheduling and funding, leaving our area in limbo, partially finished in Phases 1 & 2. The rest was left to be addressed in Phases 5 & 6, creating the “donut hole.” Phases 5 & 6 appears to have been abandoned or lost. This is unacceptable to the residents of the “Central Segments”.
Secondly, there is a section of Grant Road beginning at Santa Rita that suddenly narrows from three lanes to two lanes. This narrowed two lanes continues well past Campbell. The traffic approaching the Campbell Ave. intersection is backed up five to six blocks, making it virtually impossible at certain times of the day to exit the neighborhood. In addition, vehicles emit fumes that drift steadily into the nearby residential areas. The schedule, which allowed for such narrowing, a “wasp-waist squeeze” in the middle of the Grant, is incomprehensible.
Lastly, the many homes that have already been acquired sit empty, becoming nuisance properties, attracting drug users, homeless folks, or often become “stash” houses for stolen goods. The empty city-owned lots, where houses have already been demolished, are relatively uncared for. Whether by error or design, the schedule has caused undue hardship on the adjacent residential areas.
The south side of Grant from Santa Rita to Mountain, our neighborhood, needs only one block to complete the existing Health and Heritage Trail - finish it please! In the current state, Jefferson Park and SAMOS, part of the “Central Segments” cadre, take the brunt of the noise, 24 hours per day. The green spaces, Health and Heritage Trails on both sides, would help to alleviate the noise and pollution, while providing a pleasant place for residents to enjoy. Please, finish the acquisitions for this section, complete the road widening, create the Health and Heritage Trails for both sides, and prevent the slow erosion of these central neighborhoods of Tucson.
We have been very patient, with the understanding that if we could just wait, our turn would come. Please clarify the funding and timing situation for the Central Segments and Phases 5&6.
Sincerely,
Jefferson Park Neighborhood Association
Regional Transportation Authority
1 E Broadway Blvd, Suite 401
Tucson AZ, 85701
[email protected]
RTA and City of Tucson:
Jefferson Park Neighborhood Association strongly urges that Grant Road Phases 5 & 6 be finished now. The RTA Next Draft does not appear to include the completion of the Grant Road Project. Very real issues presently exist and will only worsen if the project is left unfinished.
First, consider the disaster that has occurred as a result of complicated scheduling and funding, leaving our area in limbo, partially finished in Phases 1 & 2. The rest was left to be addressed in Phases 5 & 6, creating the “donut hole.” Phases 5 & 6 appears to have been abandoned or lost. This is unacceptable to the residents of the “Central Segments”.
Secondly, there is a section of Grant Road beginning at Santa Rita that suddenly narrows from three lanes to two lanes. This narrowed two lanes continues well past Campbell. The traffic approaching the Campbell Ave. intersection is backed up five to six blocks, making it virtually impossible at certain times of the day to exit the neighborhood. In addition, vehicles emit fumes that drift steadily into the nearby residential areas. The schedule, which allowed for such narrowing, a “wasp-waist squeeze” in the middle of the Grant, is incomprehensible.
Lastly, the many homes that have already been acquired sit empty, becoming nuisance properties, attracting drug users, homeless folks, or often become “stash” houses for stolen goods. The empty city-owned lots, where houses have already been demolished, are relatively uncared for. Whether by error or design, the schedule has caused undue hardship on the adjacent residential areas.
The south side of Grant from Santa Rita to Mountain, our neighborhood, needs only one block to complete the existing Health and Heritage Trail - finish it please! In the current state, Jefferson Park and SAMOS, part of the “Central Segments” cadre, take the brunt of the noise, 24 hours per day. The green spaces, Health and Heritage Trails on both sides, would help to alleviate the noise and pollution, while providing a pleasant place for residents to enjoy. Please, finish the acquisitions for this section, complete the road widening, create the Health and Heritage Trails for both sides, and prevent the slow erosion of these central neighborhoods of Tucson.
We have been very patient, with the understanding that if we could just wait, our turn would come. Please clarify the funding and timing situation for the Central Segments and Phases 5&6.
Sincerely,
Jefferson Park Neighborhood Association
May 9, 2024 Minutes
Grant Road Coalition – Central Segments - Minutes of May 9, 2024 Meeting
Participants:
Jefferson Park: Joan Daniels, Colleen Nichols, Mary Alexander, Curt Ench
Mountain First: Sarah Studd
Campbell Grant: Mark and Sally Rein/Bautista
Samos: Bam Miller, Denise Ceron
Country Glenn: Sky, Judith Bauche
North University: Mike Attwood, Peg Weber, Aaron Paxton
Tucson Clean and Beautiful: Katie Gannon
Tucson Parks and Rec: Greg Jackson
Grant Road Landscape Opportunities
JP Linear park stops at Santa Rita. During Phases 5&6, 2 more blocks will be taken for the roadway leaving remnant parcels which JP wants developed as a continuation of the linear park.
Samos also wants a linear park on the north side of Grant. Four blocks of homes are to be demolished. The remnants are not available to be developed.
Campbell Grant does not have a plan. They need to discuss what to do about the remnants and discuss an overlay. They have talked about a dog park, green space, joining lots for businesses which could be accessed from the alley
Catalina Vista wants a band of protection from Grant, i.e. a frontage road, a wall.
Nuts and Bolts about Parks:
For the remnants, after demolition, they will be scraped. Any plants left in the remnant will not be moved. A contractor will be hired to take care of the remnants for two years. After two years, the remnants will be sold. I the property acquired is given back to the city then a future bond would be the best way to get money to develop linear parks.
Possible Funding Sources:
Storm to Shade. May be for smaller grants. They do not do much maintenance.
Pima Country Regional Flood Control District
Bond election
Lots of little grants
Advocating early is important.
Next Steps:
1. Neighborhood Associations get together to agree on what they want.
2. Talk with Blue Baldwin and Sam Creedo
3. Get RTA report about funding (end of May)
4. Get everyone to the table, i.e. the Wards
5. Produce information to inform others especially those on Grant
6. Get drainage map from Alejandro and rework the White Paper
(submitted by Bam Miller)
Participants:
Jefferson Park: Joan Daniels, Colleen Nichols, Mary Alexander, Curt Ench
Mountain First: Sarah Studd
Campbell Grant: Mark and Sally Rein/Bautista
Samos: Bam Miller, Denise Ceron
Country Glenn: Sky, Judith Bauche
North University: Mike Attwood, Peg Weber, Aaron Paxton
Tucson Clean and Beautiful: Katie Gannon
Tucson Parks and Rec: Greg Jackson
Grant Road Landscape Opportunities
JP Linear park stops at Santa Rita. During Phases 5&6, 2 more blocks will be taken for the roadway leaving remnant parcels which JP wants developed as a continuation of the linear park.
Samos also wants a linear park on the north side of Grant. Four blocks of homes are to be demolished. The remnants are not available to be developed.
Campbell Grant does not have a plan. They need to discuss what to do about the remnants and discuss an overlay. They have talked about a dog park, green space, joining lots for businesses which could be accessed from the alley
Catalina Vista wants a band of protection from Grant, i.e. a frontage road, a wall.
Nuts and Bolts about Parks:
For the remnants, after demolition, they will be scraped. Any plants left in the remnant will not be moved. A contractor will be hired to take care of the remnants for two years. After two years, the remnants will be sold. I the property acquired is given back to the city then a future bond would be the best way to get money to develop linear parks.
Possible Funding Sources:
Storm to Shade. May be for smaller grants. They do not do much maintenance.
Pima Country Regional Flood Control District
Bond election
Lots of little grants
Advocating early is important.
Next Steps:
1. Neighborhood Associations get together to agree on what they want.
2. Talk with Blue Baldwin and Sam Creedo
3. Get RTA report about funding (end of May)
4. Get everyone to the table, i.e. the Wards
5. Produce information to inform others especially those on Grant
6. Get drainage map from Alejandro and rework the White Paper
(submitted by Bam Miller)
May 9, 2024 Planning Paper- Information and Agenda
May 17, 2023 - Minutes, Meeting with TDOT,PSOMAS and PDSD
MINUTES GRANT ROAD COALITION May 17, 2023
Present:
NUNA: M. Atwood, A. Paxton, P. Weber
JPNA: J. Osuna, C. Nichols, J. Daniels, S. Lorch, C. Doklan, E. Posthumus, R. Schlanger
SAMOS: B. Miller, D. Ceron
Catalina Vista: J. Fischer
PDSD: D. Bursack, C. Struve, DTM: B. Roggenthen PSOMAS: R. Cheney, A. Angel
Overlay Process
Community engagement with Grant Road Task Force will begin in September 2023. Sarah Studd (of Mtn/First neighborhood) is the representative for Central Segments. DTM will contact the Coalition before the task force meeting.
Construction Cost
The construction cost is $35 million.
$50 million has been earmarked for acquisition of properties to initiate. DTM is waiting for RTA approval on this amount.
Linear Park
Art
1% of the total construction budget ($350,000) is required for art. A committee of at least 7 members meets with artists and reviews their submissions and selects the artist. Neighborhoods may request to be on the committee. B. Roggenthen suggests sites for the art where there is room and the committee, artist, and DTM will jointly decide the location.
Present:
NUNA: M. Atwood, A. Paxton, P. Weber
JPNA: J. Osuna, C. Nichols, J. Daniels, S. Lorch, C. Doklan, E. Posthumus, R. Schlanger
SAMOS: B. Miller, D. Ceron
Catalina Vista: J. Fischer
PDSD: D. Bursack, C. Struve, DTM: B. Roggenthen PSOMAS: R. Cheney, A. Angel
Overlay Process
- The overlay process is a tool allowing for flexible development and transition between developments. The overlay process has to be initiated by M&C. Must be consistent with Plan Tucson. It is a voluntary district. Is an overlay to base zoning. After it is decided to initiate overlay, it goes to the community for community engagement. Takes approximately 18-24 months.
- Grant Road has the opportunity for overlay from Campbell Avenue to Swan Road. It is as option for the sections east of Campbell Avenue.
- Odds are that the remnant parcels from Santa Rita to Campbell (north and south side) may be dealt with in the same manner as the remnant parcels from Hampton to Santa Rita. B. Roggenthen reports that other options may be combining lots, allowing adjacent neighbors to buy the segment, or RTA agrees to release the properties. Release of properties for greenspace is the most satisfactory outcome for Jefferson Park and SAMOS.
- The contractor on the project will use the remnant parcels as staging areas during the construction. After construction the contractor will maintain all new landscaping and irrigation installed within the public right of way for 2 years as part of the contract. Unknown if watering is included.
- DTM is currently in discussions with the RTA, and this will probably be completed in approximately 1 month.
- Bob Roggenthen would like a decision made regarding remnant parcels early rather than later, as it is much easier and cheaper to do the work when construction crews and equipment are on site. It is much cheaper. Unanswered question: When will final decision be made about the landscape plans and how will the neighborhoods be involved?
Community engagement with Grant Road Task Force will begin in September 2023. Sarah Studd (of Mtn/First neighborhood) is the representative for Central Segments. DTM will contact the Coalition before the task force meeting.
Construction Cost
The construction cost is $35 million.
$50 million has been earmarked for acquisition of properties to initiate. DTM is waiting for RTA approval on this amount.
Linear Park
- The JPNA linear park was $400,000 in 2020 for 2 blocks of landscaping. Due to increased cost of construction since 2020 it is estimated, the Linear Park would now cost $300,00 per block. Most costly in the JPNA linear park were the earth berms and irrigation. Xeriscape is the least expensive option. There was discussion to prioritize plantings over the berms and irrigation to reduce initial cost, as those elements could be added later.
- Funding is an issue; it would require $1.5-2 million to do a linear park similar to the existing one for north and south on Grant. Bob Roggenthen suggested that C.J. Boyd investigate to see if funds from the Storm and Shade grant could be obtained and used for this purpose the next time there is funding available.
- Noise mitigation: Noise reduction data has been prepared, and some areas along the route will need noise mitigation. Walls to mitigate must be at least 5 feet and could be up to 10 feet in height. Over 50% of affected owners must request/approve construction of a wall. Various locations have been marked for noise mitigation, but this data will not be shared until the funding is secured and the project schedule is released. Rubberized asphalt will not be used for this phase: after 3 years it compacts and is no longer effective in reducing noise.
- Light mitigation: Walls will be installed at the Michigan Left turns, and shields will be placed on all lights within the residential areas.
- Monument signs are approved for both Samos, JPNA, Mtn/First and space will be held on the plans. PSOMAS is currently adjusting the most recent plans.
- Each neighborhood must secure their own funding and installation for the signs.
Art
1% of the total construction budget ($350,000) is required for art. A committee of at least 7 members meets with artists and reviews their submissions and selects the artist. Neighborhoods may request to be on the committee. B. Roggenthen suggests sites for the art where there is room and the committee, artist, and DTM will jointly decide the location.
October 19, 2022 - Minutes, Meeting with DTM and PSOMAS
September 15, 2022 QUESTIONS and CONCERNS
Co-chairs and members of the Grant Raod Coalition convened on the 15th to begin to understand and prepare for the Phase 5 plans and changes for the "Central Segments" The neighborhood participating were: Catalina Vista, Campbell/Grant, SAMOS, Jefferson Park, and Mountain First.
Bob Roggenthen, project director has agreed to meet with the coalition Oct 19 at 6pm at the Ward III community Room. Interested neighborhos are welcome.
Bob Roggenthen, project director has agreed to meet with the coalition Oct 19 at 6pm at the Ward III community Room. Interested neighborhos are welcome.
SEPTEMBER 15, 2022 - Meeting of the Grant Road Coalition-Central Segments
Meeting in person at Ward III Community Room
Or by zoom: Time, Sep 15, 2022 6pm
https://us02web.zoom.us/j/87412834234?pwd=dUQ2aUxBYk0wNWpIYU5Wd1NoVWJMdz09
Meeting ID: 874 1283 4234 Passcode: 744057
Tentative agenda for the members of the Grant Road Coalition below
Or by zoom: Time, Sep 15, 2022 6pm
https://us02web.zoom.us/j/87412834234?pwd=dUQ2aUxBYk0wNWpIYU5Wd1NoVWJMdz09
Meeting ID: 874 1283 4234 Passcode: 744057
Tentative agenda for the members of the Grant Road Coalition below
THE COALITION is an advisory committee authorized by their respective neighborhoods to represent neighborhood interests in talks with the city specifically about the Grant Rd Project. The coalition works to create a dialogue between project administrators and neighborhood residents. The coalition addresses such issues as: Noise mitigation * Visual mitigation * Green Space * Demolition Issues * Loss of Historic Homes * Closure of neighborhood streets * Bike and pedestrian safety
DISCUSSIONS are around TWO MAIN TOPICS
Grant Road Alignment Issues - the actual path the 6 lane road will take
Land Use Issues - what will happen to vacant land after the roadway has been cut. i.e. will it be green space, commercially developed, have buffers, berms etc?
NOTE: Per the amendment to the Grant Road Vision Statement all remnant parcels in the Central Segments (First to Tucson Blvd) will have no overlay, no change in zoning. i.e. R-1 will remain R-1 zoning, NR-1 will remain NR-1.
WHITE PAPER - The Neighborhood's vision for the future of the remnant parcels through 2026. a._grt_rd_heritage_landscape_corridor_pdf_3-24-2016.pdf
DISCUSSIONS are around TWO MAIN TOPICS
Grant Road Alignment Issues - the actual path the 6 lane road will take
Land Use Issues - what will happen to vacant land after the roadway has been cut. i.e. will it be green space, commercially developed, have buffers, berms etc?
NOTE: Per the amendment to the Grant Road Vision Statement all remnant parcels in the Central Segments (First to Tucson Blvd) will have no overlay, no change in zoning. i.e. R-1 will remain R-1 zoning, NR-1 will remain NR-1.
WHITE PAPER - The Neighborhood's vision for the future of the remnant parcels through 2026. a._grt_rd_heritage_landscape_corridor_pdf_3-24-2016.pdf
Phase 5/6 Road Safety Report shared April 18. Plans at 30%. Projected 60% plans in August 2022. See the Safety report at http://www.grantroadcoalition.com/20223-safety-study.html
Grant Road 5/6 Plans are considering a "Dutch Intersesction" at Grant and Mountain. See one in action at: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=FlApbxLz6pA
PHASES 5/6 IN 30% PLANNING STAGES NOW
Grant Road Coalition resumes its advocacy
See minutes, meetings, documents relating to Phases 5 and 6 at
http://www.grantroadcoalition.com/correspondence-minutes.html
30% PLANS FOR GREENSPACE NORTH SIDE OF GRANT ROAD-Campbell to Plumer
Addresses 2100 and 2200 on Spring Street will be exposed to Grant Road
Addresses 2100 and 2200 on Spring Street will be exposed to Grant Road
30% PLANS FOR GREENSPACE SOUTH SIDE OF GRANT ROAD
Addresses 1300 to 1400 on Edison will be exposed to Grant Road
Addresses 1300 to 1400 on Edison will be exposed to Grant Road
30% PLANS FOR GREENSPACE NORTH SIDE OF GRANT ROAD to Campbell
Addresses 1500 -1900 on Spring Street will be exposed to Grant Road
Addresses 1500 -1900 on Spring Street will be exposed to Grant Road
NEW CONCERN FOR THE GRANT ROAD COALITION MEMBERS
Why should GRC be concerned about the proposed TEP power lines? At first TEP was considering many routes. As of the Nov 4 presentation to Mayor and Council the options for the lines is reduced, however, now all options include Grant Road. Two of the options include routes bisecting the Jefferson Park neighborhood. The Campbell route impacts GRC members, Blenman/Elm, Catalina Vista, and Jefferson Park. TEP has not yet decided upon which side of Grant Road will be chosen. This now makes it a concern of GRC members Sugar Hill, SAMOS, Mountain/First, Jefferson Park
Go to the UNDERGROUND TEP tab to see more information, updates and list of contacts
Why should GRC be concerned about the proposed TEP power lines? At first TEP was considering many routes. As of the Nov 4 presentation to Mayor and Council the options for the lines is reduced, however, now all options include Grant Road. Two of the options include routes bisecting the Jefferson Park neighborhood. The Campbell route impacts GRC members, Blenman/Elm, Catalina Vista, and Jefferson Park. TEP has not yet decided upon which side of Grant Road will be chosen. This now makes it a concern of GRC members Sugar Hill, SAMOS, Mountain/First, Jefferson Park
Go to the UNDERGROUND TEP tab to see more information, updates and list of contacts
SEE THE PROGRESS TOWARD A LINEAR HEALTH/HERITAGE TRAIL
under "PROPOSALS/PROJECTS" tab
Read the history of grants and partnerships to bring this vision to reality
under "PROPOSALS/PROJECTS" tab
Read the history of grants and partnerships to bring this vision to reality
Phases 1 and 2, 2015 - 2018 A history
UA Landscape Graduate class submits first images of Park Concept for Remnants
http://www.jeffersonpark.info/landscapes.html
Six landsacpe designs were created by the graduate class in landscape design taught by Margaret Livingston, Ph.D., Professor of Landscape Architecture, College of Architecture, Planning, and Landscape Architecture. Those were presented at a public meeting Nov 28, 2017. The plans are now posted to the Jefferson Park website, at the link above, for all to see and comment upon.
http://www.jeffersonpark.info/landscapes.html
Six landsacpe designs were created by the graduate class in landscape design taught by Margaret Livingston, Ph.D., Professor of Landscape Architecture, College of Architecture, Planning, and Landscape Architecture. Those were presented at a public meeting Nov 28, 2017. The plans are now posted to the Jefferson Park website, at the link above, for all to see and comment upon.
TIMING FOR THE CENTRAL SEGMENTS and CENTRAL CENTERS will happen in two different time frames.
- Phase 2 -2015 to 2018, from Stone to just east of Park (Santa Rita) which impacts Jefferson Park Neighborhood
- Phase 5/6 - from Santa Rita to Country Club which impacts Jefferson Park again, and SAMOS, Campbell/Grant, and Catalina Vista neighborhoods may not begin until 2026! (per Grant Road Task Force Meeting Oct 19, 2017)
THE GREAT WIDENING - A SLIDE SHOW- This power point was created by S. Studd, of Mountain/First neighborhood. it was presented on August 22 to neighbors and stakeholders who wanted to review what has happened in the past 2+ years of neighborhood involvement in the Grant Road widening process. Published for your review below.
Karin's Uhlich's e-mail of support for the Linear Trail to Tucson Mayor and City Manager!!!
(July 16, 2017) Regarding our ongoing conversation and next steps for the park space along Grant road, I want to update you and confirm the City's support:
1) PAG is continuing to work with us on funds for the Heritage and Health trail (involving Banner, Jefferson Park and area neighborhoods; we need to sustain the City's commitment (already approved as an exception by RTA/PAG given City plans to keep it as Park) to HOLD AND NOT MARKET/SELL the remnants between 1st and Campbell (Tucson) as leverage for the project. While the National Parks grant did not come through, there are opportunities for funding (state and federal) that are being pursued.
2) see below; the State Dept of Forestry has encouraged applications from PAG/City/JP. The first small grant proposal is next FRIDAY under their TREES program and must be submitted under the auspices of the City. JP is drafting and we will get that to Mike's office to submit (I am assuming no other City proposals are in the queue; let me know)
3) PAG/Farhad has agreed to serve as lead and submitter of other proposals (with City as key supporter/collaborator.
Could you please confirm through a reply to this email that this will be our plan moving forward? Through we did not secure the National Parks Grant we can also resubmit next year and it is clear we can identify other potential funding sources to fulfill the exciting and meaningful vision for this area. I know we share the desire to demonstrate that corridor redevelopment can be integrated with appropriate land use that preserves value and enhances quality of life for urban residents. This project is a valuable chance to enact that principle, in-keeping with both City and RTA goals. Karin
1) PAG is continuing to work with us on funds for the Heritage and Health trail (involving Banner, Jefferson Park and area neighborhoods; we need to sustain the City's commitment (already approved as an exception by RTA/PAG given City plans to keep it as Park) to HOLD AND NOT MARKET/SELL the remnants between 1st and Campbell (Tucson) as leverage for the project. While the National Parks grant did not come through, there are opportunities for funding (state and federal) that are being pursued.
2) see below; the State Dept of Forestry has encouraged applications from PAG/City/JP. The first small grant proposal is next FRIDAY under their TREES program and must be submitted under the auspices of the City. JP is drafting and we will get that to Mike's office to submit (I am assuming no other City proposals are in the queue; let me know)
3) PAG/Farhad has agreed to serve as lead and submitter of other proposals (with City as key supporter/collaborator.
Could you please confirm through a reply to this email that this will be our plan moving forward? Through we did not secure the National Parks Grant we can also resubmit next year and it is clear we can identify other potential funding sources to fulfill the exciting and meaningful vision for this area. I know we share the desire to demonstrate that corridor redevelopment can be integrated with appropriate land use that preserves value and enhances quality of life for urban residents. This project is a valuable chance to enact that principle, in-keeping with both City and RTA goals. Karin